Printable View
"So everybody perceives things differently.Thats all "
xactly my point dear.........i dunt think kamal is a natural actor and is only a good drama artiste.....u cant refute this too rite.........according to me, Mohan Lal, Prakash Raj, Raghuvaran and om puri are the best and kamal comes next........
hey i think we need to shift our arguement to a different,more apt thread as we have almost spoiled this thread......
heyy.the comparison must be correct first.Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
please dont include prakash raj and raghuvaran here.
they are not so good actors.
mammoty is good
mohan lal is better
kamal haasan is best
om puri is also very good but he cant do all roles.
onething,u cant say who act naturally only is the best actor.
an actor must be good at all types of acting like under playing,drama playing,natural acting and sometimes melo drama.
kamal does everything.thats the reason ,he is best.
This makes me laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
After reading this post see Swades again and then give your
comments Maddy.
In fact, I loved Swades, I liked it so much that after watching
the movie, about over 2 am here, I called a friend and told
him about this movie and insisted that he watches it.
The reason is not SRK's perfomance, the inspiring theme.
As a matter of fact, I would have preferred to see Swades
in a more "Raw" type of version where the story was made
more naturally without songs (or songs just in background)
and where the hero did not cry so much. Now, see the movie
again, especially the scene where SRK cries and tell me if you
really find them natural and fitting into the context. Also
SRK has not given a real great/different perfomance compared
to his earlier movies.
Watch Swades, after than watch Mahanadi or Guna or Nayagan
or many such movies, after than watch a couple of SRK movies,
the best of your choice again and think over again and give
your comments buddy.
Stop drinking haterade u...............!!!!!! :evil: :x
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaotic whisperz
hi vasanthQuote:
Originally Posted by vasanth_luv
as chaotic whispers cant give one valid point on sharuk's acting he is just blabbering
girish.....i know evryone laugh for this but lemme tell u, when i was writing my Final year paper in engg, in the exam hall a small boy of 7 yrs came gave water to me as we didnt have permission to walk upto the cooler during exam hours and they had employed a boy for this job only.........my heart felt so heavy and i shed a tear looking at that boy.......wat sin did he commit and wat gr8ness did i do- i'm writing a engg paper and that small boy does not even have the privilige of going to primary school......i shed tears and cried in my mom's lap at my home....when i saw that scene repeating in swades i cried in movie hall only.......that's y i call it as the best performance of SRK.......that's natural acting for u guys......how a person will react to situations........SRK bought it out beautifully.........i've never felt it in a kamal's movie.......
nilavu- go and watch Arindhum Ariyamalum- Prakash Raj at his best......he just became the father of teenage boy in that movie......that is how u shuld gel with the character.......Guna- kamal did so much overacting that it was unwatchable for more than 15 minutes.......pathetic guy......
Maddy,Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
I bet, there number of people who cried while watching
K3G are atleast a 100 times more than Swades. Do you agree?
Would you rate K3G to be a better movie in comparison with
Swades?
For me, K3G was a total nonsense movie I just laughed
throught the movie seeing how illogical it was, whereas Swades
was in a totally different league and a different class.
What makes you cry while watching something depends on
many different factors, your charecter/criticism level/tolerance
to illogical making etc.
Baghban bought lump to my throat more times than Anbe sivam
but I would never rate Baghban better than AS just because
Baghban made me cry more, there is not way.
Guna, you can ask many, is no way rated as over acting, I am
not saying this from Kamals fans point of view, you can ask
non Kamal fans who have seen it. In context to the charecter,
the acting is absolutely natural. I rate Guna to be the best
perfomance by Kamal till date.
Further, I dont have anything agains SRK, I like him, until very
recently I had high regards for him and looked forward eagerly
to his movies. But his stereo typed perfomances have made
me lose interest in him. The more I see him now, the worse it is.
The last perfomance which I saw, in Silsilay, I have reached the
point of not being able to stand it any more. It was just too much.
His perfomance in Swades is no doubt a decent perfomance
except a few scenes.
no girish....i never told crying is the only good emotion that could be shown.......it was just an example of how an normal man wud react to situations.....K3G is the worst hit movie in indian history according to me.......SRK is repeatedly doing crap....he has so much talent that he can act in diff. movies but he has been wasted here.....if he had been in Tamil/Malayalam where there is more scope for acting he wud have been a gr8 actor........
heyy.crying doesnt depends upon only acting.it depends upon the situation.i shall tell u a scene where i cried at the theatre.mind its a comedy film not a serious film like swades.Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
in pammal.k.sambandham.,
kamal will know that simran has acted as loving him for taking the watch from his stomach.the scenes before this scene were completely hilarious.but at this scene after knowing she had acted,just by his reactions he turned the audience from a jolly mood to tears.
in the following scene ,where he will meet his grand father and say
"nan andha ponna venamnu sollula thaatha.andha ponnu than enna venanturuchu.andha ponnu enna inga kuthuchu(heart).nee enna inga kuthu(hand)"
i was in tears for 5 minutes.thats acting.he made me cry only by his acting.not the situation.
mind onething the person sitting near me was also crying.
Maddy,Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
The situation of SRK is quite complicated right now. Keeping
BO and star status/image in mind, he is stuck to the happy go
lucky type of roles trying to flash his charm time and again
and not getting out of the shell (Swades is an exception).
I think he has developed an insecurity due to movies
which failed where he tried to do something different, the most
recent example is Swades. An other such example I can
remember is Asoka.
When he was new, he was trying to do different roles, that is
the time I was attracted to SRK and was hoping he would
continue to do so and end up in the list of one of the great
talented/versatile actors of India. Sadly that is not the case.
The irony is, today many actors who normally used to do
stereo typed roles are experimenting, trying out different
things, improving their acting, doing negative roles too,
last 2-3 years you can see the way the likes of Ajay devgun,
Akshay Kumar, Amitabh even Abishek recently are focussing
on doing different type of roles. Hope SRK will follow this path
soon and bring out the talents in him.