No. I do not mean to kill the enthusiasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudhaama
Any discussions on literature can happen for two reasons:
1. Discuss in appreciation of the imaginative genious of the authors of those days which calls you for understanding things going back to Dwarpa-Yuga. We do not need to actually believe in the flying rathas nor do we need to agree upon who is wrong and who is right. Simply we will experience it for the pleasure reading it. An inter-preter in this case performs the role of a mere translator and nothing more. There is not "why" or "how" questions asked.
2. The second way is to look at a piece of literature as a morale exemplenaire. If we choose to do so, we must see it from what is applicable and understandable in the present context, which is the Kali-Yuga. This approach calls for being critical of anything that is described in the literature which cannot be applied today or cannot happen today. Here the inter-preter plays the role of a defender of the literature, and has to explain both the "whys" and "hows", while others are critical about it. If a flying ratha is not possible today, other ideas of the literature are not applicable too.
This thread looked for me a bit more serious to be described as pursuing the first approach. But it did not 100% fit the second approach too. A lot of "why" questions were asked as if it mattered a lot, but no "how" questions have come-up so far. To me, if the "hows" are not explained in literature, then there is no need for anyone to be seriously asking a "why" question.
With many "whys" and no "hows" in this thread, I was confused. That is "why" I asked.