Printable View
Roger kku injury nnu solrardhellam ok dhaan but he was medically cleared to play last year. If you are injured don't play thats it. If you are not fit to compete at the maximum level edhukku vilayadanaum.??. edhukku thokkanum and then say it is due to injury? :huh:
And I don't buy the argument that Nadal's best years are over as well. Nadal is a force to reckon with in tennis. He will certainly be back for sure.
[html:a4401498af]<img src =http://lh4.ggpht.com/_X3Fcs2gAaUY/SlEnkMraWnI/AAAAAAAAAgs/wB0KK88S7jw/b_013_fourChamps_145_aeltc_b_martin.jpg>[/html:a4401498af]
Thanks PR :)
Borg, Sampras, Fed and Laver and there are 22 wimbledon's all-together.
Singam and Federer, sila pala similarities irukku - Positives irukkave irukku of course but more importantly, negatives, definitely...
Federer's 50 aces has been talked about much, but it only shows how weak a returner Roddick is. Infact that was the only difference between him & Roger yesterday. Had it been Murray/Nadal on the other end, I am sure the aces count would be around 30 or so. Federer definitely has worked on his serve but it is not such an improvement. Moreover, he didn't play his best tennis in the final. He rarely attacked the net (compared to what he did against Haas in SF) & there were no drop shots played.
I pitty Rod that inspite of winning more games than Fed he ended up losing. The other numbers are so close too (I don't agree counting aces in the winners column at all).
Well said omega.
:exactly:
Quote:
Originally Posted by omega
Exactly! And enakku therinju at least two attempted drop shots (which worked like magic in the semi) didn't clear the netQuote:
Originally Posted by omega
I would be happy if I am proved wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by ajithfederer
I am one of those who strongly believe Nadal's best is behind him now. Sure he will win few more GS in future, but may not be able to win like he did starting same time last year till his knees quit a month ago. His game style is very demanding to each & every portion of his body (starting from wrist to ankle). Sure he is very young & can fight everything now. Unless he changes his game style (which I doubt very much) he would find it difficult to keep the intensity. I won't be surprised, if he even avoids hard courts in future. Eager to see how he defends in Rogers cup.
Amazing to see how this guy can keep winning inspite of playing mediocre (by his own standards offcourse) tennis. He is getting better & better in playing those long 5 setters effortlessly. I think he will upto the task next time he faces Nadal.Quote:
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
After playing for 4hours & 20 minutes this guy (for that matter even Roddick was looking fresh) looked as fresh as he could be.