இதுக்கு பேரு ரிவியூவா ? இடியட் .. சீன் பை சீனா சொல்லிட்டிருக்கான்.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragu Raj
Printable View
இதுக்கு பேரு ரிவியூவா ? இடியட் .. சீன் பை சீனா சொல்லிட்டிருக்கான்.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragu Raj
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
கொஞ்ச நேரத்திற்கு முன்புதான் இப்படி டுவிட்டியிருந்தென்.
21ம்நூற்றாண்டில் தமிழ்ப்படங்கள், இசை மீதான பத்திரிகை, இணைய விமர்சனங்களின் தரவீழ்ச்சியினை கட்டுரையாக ஆவணப்படுத்தலாம். வரலாறு ரொம்ப முக்கியம்.
பொதுவாக இவனுங்க கொடுக்கிற மதிப்பெண்கள், நட்சத்திரங்கள் எல்லாமே நகைச்சுவையின் உச்சம். ஒரு காட்சி கூட ரசிக்க முடியாத படங்களுக்கு 3 கொடுப்பதும், ரொம்ப சிறப்பா வந்திருக்கிற படங்களுக்கு எதோ கர்ண வள்ளல் போல 3.25 கொடுப்பதும் காலக் கொடுமை. வெகுஜனங்களின் பொதுபுத்தி, பொதுரசனை மற்றும் இவர்களிலிருந்து உதிர்த்து வந்த Mediocrity விமர்சகர்கள் மத்தியில் முகநூல், ட்வீட்டர் மற்றும் மையம் போன்ற உரையாடல் தளங்களில் நாம் நம் வழியினை மாற்றாமல் பயணிப்பதுதான் 21ம் நூற்றாண்டின் உச்சநிலை சகிப்புத்தன்மை.
Ramesh @rameshlaus 3h3 hours ago
#Thoongaavanam does well on Tuesday in #USA $87,986 Total 2 days $164, 027 and moves ahead of #Vedalam Tue $42,621 ($135,104 2 days)
41 retweets 63 likes
This is what is a "template" movie. Kamal's 2015 movies, in particular, have all been very different and also scoring at the box office. So, in many ways, he is trying to elevate and redefine what it means to experience an interesting tamil movie. While he has been doing this for many years/decades, he is doing it more directly and consistently now.Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
started seeing shows increasing for thoongavanam here in mid west as well
Attachment 4665Attachment 4666Attachment 4667Attachment 4668
ATMUS Entertainment @ATMUSent 2h2 hours ago
@ATMUSent and, as expected, Thoongavanam takes the lead on day 2. Ulaganayagan proves USA is his fort.
Movie is very good. I did see Sleepless night and I felt TV has more scope for emotion connect between father-son than the original did.
Santhana Bharathi's anti-fan stance was so meta-tastic (movie being banned, fans turned away as result.) However, I don't understand the mixed feedback from people. This is the same folk who complained about a certain budget films having wafer thin story, grapicks, poor baadi language, saavu aadkiraanga songs. naalaiku VS intha madhri padam pannina, athey complain panra makkal paapaaanga? Or is this Anti-KH stance that certain UCRs are having grudge since Hey Ram time? Will they start singing praises for other guy's next if it doesn't get lapped up by neutrals? Seri vidunga.
I did feel like this bag plot device being tossed around reminded me of Pushpak plot when KH takes the rich-drunkard's role as weathy-man. Only flaw I can see was the attempts at comedy from time to time. Some jokes aside, it wasn't needed.
Nevertheless, good that KH is back though he's looking tired of late (back to back productions, man he doesn't rest, but he continues to deliver.) Hope this movie runs well. I still want Vishwaroop 2 to see light in 2016 by hook or crook and get the max promotions possible.
The reviews have been positive in my opinion if you are to take an average. You will have negative comments coming in however for which the particular person is entitled to. But I do find it hard to give much credit to the reviews to be frank. We don't have a culture of reviewing films objectively do we. Film criticism in Tamil Nadu is poor and has been the same for years. All we get in most reviews are generic statements about how the one man show of the hero saves the film, the cinematography was breathtaking so on so forth. The biggest poosi muzhugal is about the editing. If the film's a tad long, they question the editor. Its hard for me fathom as to how professional reviewers think that an editor's job is just to contain a film to specific duration. Take Uttama Villain for example, you had people praising the sound editing. But how many looked into it objectively. And its only getting worse. Used to be a regular patron of pro-reviews, but that boat's sailed. I find it infuriating when reviews speak a couple of paragraphs about a movie and finish it with an overall verdict or a score. Reviews in Bollywood are way better. You have the likes of Raja Sen, Sudish Kamath et al. Their reviews might be polarising, but at least they are objective. I would go one step further and say that the standard of pro-reviews in TFI is indicative of the standard of cinema we produce.Quote:
Originally Posted by nickraman
looks like shows are increasing in india too
Mass Maharaja @Mass_Maharaja 47s47 seconds ago
@Ajaychairman @sekartweets SPI cinemas has allotted 35 shows for #Thoongavanam and 30 for Vedalam today. Is this a recent change?
http://www.tamilboxoffice1.com/2015/...tions.html?m=1
மதுரை area-ல 60 lakhs collect பண்ணுச்சாம்.
Actual day 1 மதுரை ரிப்போர்ட்;(ticket rates are 150 &200)
inox(24shows*300(seat capacity*120(ticket rate))-8,64,000
cinipriya(6*900*150)-8,10,000
regal(6*800*150)-7,20,000
shanmuga(1100*6*150)-9,90,000
saraswathi(1100*6*150)-9,90,000
verri(800*6*150)-7,20,000
Total -50.9 laks.
மதுரையை சுற்றி கிட்டதட்ட 25 திரை அரங்குகளுக்கு மேல் ஓடுகிறது.
இப்படி எல்லாம் report கொடுப்பதால் இவர்களுக்கு என்ன லாபம்?