I don't think this film is pessimistic. As app said, Tulabaram is, Pasa Malar too. This one has a happy ending, in fact. There is hope for the good characters in the movie to move on and start life afresh.
Printable View
I don't think this film is pessimistic. As app said, Tulabaram is, Pasa Malar too. This one has a happy ending, in fact. There is hope for the good characters in the movie to move on and start life afresh.
Cant think of many Tamil movies which can give room to 20 pages of thought provoking discussion, criticism, credits, POVs etc, this itself shows the depth in the movie. Excellent views, true the movie has a masochistic nerve line through out. I can also think of Aarulirundhu aruvadhu varai as a less complicated, little crudely dramatic "pessimistic" movie.
After all, we didn't discuss much of that jail portion!
அருமையான பதிவுகள்.. :clap:
உங்கள் சக ஹப்பனாக இருப்பதில் பெருமை.. :anandakanneer:
Very good discussion and great posts as usual by P_R. This is my single favourite Tamil film. I'll come back to participate in the larger discussion, but just to respond to Maddy's point here, here's an old post (in which also I was responding to Maddy!):
Quote:
Originally Posted by equanimus
yes thats what i think it is........coming rite after 92' cauvery riots, it is so evident.....
normally, prostitutes, esp high profile ones are supposed to speak in multiple languages for better client servicing......so, i would think venki knowing manju can speak kannada, he speaks in his mother tongue to her......and the kannada that venki speaks is not the "nambilki, nimbilki" kannada - it comes off good.....and since there is no evidence of both of them speaking another line in kannada after that scene- im entitled to assume it this way......
Maddy,
That there is no other pointer except a passing line he speaks in Kannada makes you entitled to assume he IS a Kannadiga in the film?! That his Kannada is good is hardly reason enough to claim he's a Kannadiga. Surely his Tamil is also very good throughout the film?! My explanation (admittedly vague, but my point is there's nothing that backs your claim on the other hand) is he's a top-rung businessman, well-travelled, so he probably speaks good Kannada. Why should it be like "nambilki" and so on? Haven't you seen people from TN who speak preliminary Kannada pretty well (like a local speaker) after they spend some years in Bangalore or Mysore for that matter?
If you're talking about the linguistic identity of a character, shouldn't you be looking at much more relevant markers? For starters, is Venkatachalam a common name for a Kannadiga? As far as I've seen, it's prevalent only among Tamils and Telugus.