UlagaNayagan KAMALHAASAN in ||"PAPANASAM"|| Directed by Jeethu Joseph

**Cinemarasigan** · 27th July 2015, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Raajjaa

wrong calculation. 100 is not correct.

100 is less or more ?

**Google Adsense** · 27th July 2015 12:26 PM

**Raajjaa** · 27th July 2015, 01:37 PM

100 is more. It is 78.

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 27th July 2015, 07:28 PM

Originally Posted by interz

I dont think you are a fan of an actor if your worship is about putting other actors down with rude comments. Can you bury the hatchet and start having healthy discussions about the movie instead?

He has been doing this for almost two decades, athu avaru "Thozhil Dharmam", professional ethics !

**Adox** · 27th July 2015, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by dell_gt

Week : 4
Total collections in Chennai : Rs. 4,19,98,336
Chennai city verdict: Hit
No. Shows in Chennai (Weekend): 78
Collection in Chennai (Weekend): Rs. 11,70,634
No. Shows in Chennai (Weekdays): 176
Collection in Chennai (Weekdays): Rs. 15,47,232
Papanasam is super steady despite all the new releases and earns the rightful Hit verdict upgrade.

Mukhi-Mukhi they're saying its a hit only now where it should have been a SH or a BB. Nelama pa ... It should have been the case if either ROI or collections are considered as a criteria.

Read somewhere that by the time Bahubali moved from break even to profitable status, it was already considered a BB based on just collections alone.

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 27th July 2015, 08:18 PM

Sify as been calling the status as "average" till recently ,but now Sify is claiming the film to be a "Hit" ..

**Adox** · 27th July 2015, 08:45 PM

That's the case with most of the media. Agree initially not much info. was coming out reg. PN collections for whatever reason ... Now that the producers have finally come out with the numbers and nearly all know that the costs associated with making the movie is under 30c its a no brainer as to what category the movie belongs ...