I am putting a word out if Roger doesn't win anymore slams from now on, Nole's gonna surpass Rafa (GS Count)in the next 2-3 years, IMHO.
1. 16 + Counting Grandslams
2. 237 Continous weeks as No 1;
3. 23 Consecutive Grandslam semifinals (2004 Wimbledon - 2010 Australian Open)
4. 92-5 Win loss in the year 2006; 12 Titles ; Talk about almost total domination.
5. 44+ titles in Hard courts; 2 shy of tying all time leader Agassi.
6. 65 consecutive grass court match victories (2003 - 2008)
7. 56 consecutive hard court match victories (2005–2006)
8. 22 Grandslam Finals.
9. Only Player to win ATP WTF undefeated 4 times (2003, 2004, 2006, 2010).
10. The biggest of all; 5 Consecutive Wimbledons+ 5 Consecutive US Opens (Somebody defeat this feat!!)
I am putting a word out if Roger doesn't win anymore slams from now on, Nole's gonna surpass Rafa (GS Count)in the next 2-3 years, IMHO.
Oh no way. Murray will play his part. Tsonga will play his part. Even Del P is no push-over. Djoker no longer invincible.
...an artist without an art.
I don't deny your point kid. Let's see. Even in the next slam the highest chance is for Nole then to Fed/Murray and others given that there is no Rafa there.
Idha thaan pala naala koovitrukken, padhil varla. Appo Fannie D V than greatest.Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Thirumba thirumba Djoker defeated Roger in semis-ne sollitrukkaaru.
Oru 31 vayasu kezhavana veeztha kashtam, and veezhthittu GOAT glory hunting panna vendiyadhu. And look at how conveniently (without conscience) use the "close" loss argument. We should have at least 2-3 GS more now, if we go by "close" finishes.
Is it all because of Sampras? Avvalavu paasama?
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
From being comfortable ride for Djoker, it was already closing down to even matches, and Nadar is getting back to make Djoker his ditch.
Djoker is now losing badly to Del P, and nearly lost to Aandi petti in Ozzie as well.
So yes, reasonably conclusive enough to say Djoker on his way down here.
If Nadar comes back fit (which is his biggest problem), he'd be back to making Djoker his ditch full-time next season. The curve is down again.
Never been Sampras fan, Rafter on the other hand..
...an artist without an art.
Couple of years back, Federer was still 31?
Personally, I think Federer's a natural athlete and could play till his 35's.
...an artist without an art.
Still better how about having the entire ATP tour on clay (only RED though)?
Hoffa will disappear...
Length of season will not matter (can even be extended further)...
Heck with 2 year ranking, even ranking on weekly basis will do..
Sounds extremely good. Who knows may happen.
Last edited by omega; 20th August 2012 at 04:44 PM.
So Novak's pinnacle season. he not only beat Nadar, he beat Federer to get to Nadar.
Nadar when dominating beat Djoker AND Federer.
Federer beats Djoker, but never faces Nadar.
Omeha,
The strategy is that Nadar planning to win one WTF in closed-roof in-door chOppu.
Ideal conditions thaan (indoor) ellaarukkum allergy aachche...
Heck it suits Roger's game & he can only win on such conditions (how dependent he is on conditions).
Did ATP shift WTF to any indoor clay??
Roger will not win WTF 2012. I expect Murray to win it.
Last edited by omega; 20th August 2012 at 04:52 PM.
Oh and this,
Can you ask Hoffa to show up on the other side like Roger showed up every time on Hoffa's fav. surface...
A guy who has won GS as early as 19, who have beat No.1 on his least fav. surface (2004 Miami Masters) in their very first meeting,
can't get to USO finals till 2010.. He was still maturing ahh?? Doesn't it tell you something.. Yes he is only capable of beating Roger in any surface. Unfortunately he had to beat 6 other guys before meeting Roger. ATP should've given him 6 round byes to meet Roger directly in the Finals right. Given such, he would have been still able to do that (beat Roger). You would have gloated even more.
How all of sudden Olympic Gold Medal became that important (just because Roger didn't have it). Heck if Roger had got it, then irukkave irukku Davis Cup right?? From when did all these crap became so important. Shabba, muydiayla...
How do you expect to beat a chicken who doesnt show up?
To me H2H doesn't show the greatness of a player. On deep analysis only portrays his weakness/cleverness after realizing how skewed it is.
Last edited by omega; 20th August 2012 at 05:07 PM.
Very clever in deflating any future arguments by Fedtards (past his prime) after losing to Hoffa in future.
So till 35 Roger will be considered in prime & is expected to beat both Nole & Hoffa back in back in a GS event.
If one or the other doesn't show up then it doesn't count.
Wareh whah!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks