-
2nd July 2015, 06:39 PM
#11
Member
Regular Hubber
One thing I don't understand is: why is there a request/demand to retire?
I can understand in a scenario like cricket where the person is holding on to a spot and the selectors feel obligated because of the past record; stepping down allows a new comer to come in.
In a field like cinema, what good does a person retiring do for the field?
Regarding Rajini's contributions, he has concentrated on the commercial side and has done quite a lot- opened up new markets, made movie watching a team activity (which encourages theatre going) and so much more in terms of increasing the revenue stream.
By the same token, actors concentrating on non-commercial movies have failed miserably on the problem of how to make movies without popular appeal, financially viable. They still concentrate on how to increase viewership as a solution!
Criteria like "doing new things" are really for the individual fan debates, not for the quality of cinema. If one wants to see different stuff, just go see different stars/ directors!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
2nd July 2015 06:39 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
Bookmarks