Origin of Hindi and Urdu

[Rohit]

Present day regional languages borrow more than 80 per cent words from Sanskrit.

No wonder why their evolution remained ceased for centuries and no wonder why they all remained utterly incapable of dealing with the advanced subject matters of science, engineering, mathematics in general and also of modern economics, commerce etc. No wonder at all.

Anyway, here, language is meant as natural language and not as artificial languages used for software development for, or programming of, computers and robots or AI that may not develop autonomous thinking capacity of their own in a foreseeable future.

A language must carry social dimensions; and likewise, there must exist linguistic dimensions of society too.

A language can serve as a medium of communication, only if it is spoken and/or written by society.

A language must be capable of communication of thoughts and experiences through structural representation of conceptual terms having cognitive dimensions and/or orientations.

A language should be capable of serving as a medium of communication, both for vocal and/or written instructions as well as in education in general.

When a language loses its social dimensions, and at the same time, the linguistic dimensions of society towards the language no longer exist, the language degenerates, becomes dead and eventually goes extinct.

Those who suffer from cognitive degeneration, which renders them incapable of grasping the overall process involved in language development and its evolution as briefly described earlier, invariably use false analogies and dissonance ridden fallacies to maintain the false value of the dead and/or extinct languages.

Such approach avoidance conflicts are frequently observed in those dull novices who are inculcated to assimilate almost all forms of fallacies and blunders, since they severely lacked in autonomous thinking ability to grasp the essentials and correlates of situations. And therefore, they may never realise the fact that they indiscriminately keep committing fallacies and blunders while arguing without having any real evidence in support even when the situation necessarily requires some strong ones.

Nonetheless, there is no stronger evidence of the death of a language than the dead language itself.