-
16th December 2005, 07:07 PM
#11
Re: KUMARI KANDAM FABLES
Originally Posted by
solomon
Friends,
I have quoted from the book authored by V.P.PURUSHOTHAM- Sanga Kala Mannargal Nilai Varalaru, which has also a foreword by Director of International Tamil Studies and ThaniTamil movement Scholor Mr.SalaIlanthiraiyan.
Silapathikaram Line tells Kumari Kodu, does not means Kandam, and moreover Satelite Pictures do not support any Below SEA land mass Between Indian Ocean to Pacific.
Pavanar Schools Mr.Kodumudi Shanmugam in his Recent book completely Disowns Kumari Kandam Fables siting the above and the CENTENARY Meeting in Honour of Pavanr in Chennai University.
MosesSolomon
sorry sirs,
a foreword by the director of tanithamizh movement---------------any politician never ever did any grasp on LANGUAGE , CLASSICAL that is , and CIVILIZATION(everybody will agree sure on civilization and politician Iam sure)
AND heard of the ATLANTIS- go to http://www.atlan.org/book/ please see it for yourselvesLOST CONTINENT ? FOR A LONG time until ARCHAEOLOGY and OCEANOLOGY took the subject everybody thought it was A MYTH, BUT NO , THERE WAS ATLANTIS scientists say now!!!!!
as the wise old king said(solomon) there is no satellite pictures or physical underwater Reef or Ridges yet of the submerged Atlantis!!
YET OCEAN ARCHAEOLOGY reveals possibilities of a submerged land mass in the Atlantic ocean.
THAT IS BECAUSE THE EARTH'S CRUST MOVES A LOT IN 1000'S OF YEARS; AND SIMILARLY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY also AGREES to the history of KUMARI CONTINENT -ALONG with existence of the city of DWARAKA that LORD KRISHNA BUILT FOR HIS PEOPLE and that a bigger city of MAHABALIPURAM AND POOMPUGAAR AS PROVED BY THE EXPEDITIONS OF SIR GRAHAM HANCOCK AND THE ROYAL BRITISH DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY(visit Graham Hancock Ocean archaeology websites)
By the by have you read the North Indian Historians giving proof on the TIMELINE OF LORD KRISHNA IN THE YEAR 4,100 B.C.E. AND THEIR EARLIEST SANSKRIT WORK BASED ON THE POSITION OF STARS AND CONSTELLATIONS IN THAT PERIOD TO ABOUT 8,000 B.C.E.
BASED ON THE SAME CALCULATIONS THEY HAVE ALSO DERIVED THE TIMELINE OF TAMIL WORKS TO 65OO B.C.E.
(read it in my previous links on these calculations).
According to those SENIOR North Indian Historians these are scientific facts that holds good.
WHEN SCIENCE SAYS IT YOU SHOULD BE BRAVE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT THAT THE EARLIEST TAMIZH AND SANSKRIT WORKS DATE AROUND 6500 TO 8,000 B.C.E.
-
16th December 2005 07:07 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
18th February 2006, 02:11 AM
#12
Senior Member
Regular Hubber
senthilkumaras, great post buddy, what an excellent work !
Well done !
F.S.Gandhi vandayar, Nedunchezhiyan, Idiappam, mahadevan
i too appreciate your view and opinion.
Defenders of Tamil can be proud.
Unfortunately our culture is not well known by about 98 % of people in this Earth...
It's unfortunate with a huge heritage like ours...
What i can say is that Human is Ignorant by nature.
I don't say i know everything, if you understood that it's a mistake, what i say is that we are all ignorants... Nobody can pretend to detain the Truth, it's foolish.
-
18th February 2006, 02:31 AM
#13
Senior Member
Regular Hubber
Another remark,
Majority of indians are still brainwashed by the european concept of Aryan/Dravidian races... There is not such division !
If someone say that Sanskrit have a Tamil-Brahmi root, it so does mean that division between the indian languages by Indo-European and Dravidian does not exist and that it exists only one super-family of indian language !!
Everybody should understand that !
But it's sure that with time and evolution , one language changes...
Modern Tamil vocabulary is composed by many english words...
Bookmarks