-
9th January 2015, 10:02 PM
#1471
Senior Member
Diamond Hubber
Originally Posted by
Dilbert
Oh comeon talk with some sense bay , who asked these guys to pay price of enthiran or even higher for a movie which has much less production value. Its just pure greed nothing else. If equation was other way around these idiots would have donated extra profit to some charity? These are guys who needs to be eliminated from the business model.
well said
Om Namaste astu Bhagavan Vishveshvaraya Mahadevaya Triambakaya Tripurantakaya Trikalagni kalaya kalagnirudraya Neelakanthaya Mrutyunjayaya Sarveshvaraya Sadashivaya Shriman Mahadevaya Namah Om Namah Shivaye Om Om Namah Shivaye Om Om Namah Shivaye
-
9th January 2015 10:02 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
9th January 2015, 10:18 PM
#1472
Senior Member
Devoted Hubber
Originally Posted by
Dilbert
Oh comeon talk with some sense bay , who asked these guys to pay price of enthiran or even higher for a movie which has much less production value. Its just pure greed nothing else. If equation was other way around these idiots would have donated extra profit to some charity? These are guys who needs to be eliminated from the business model.
It has become a habit these days 1. To file a lawsuit that the story was copied 2. No ROI paid a lot of money to procure the movie.
Is there a proper source to declare what the movie actually made? No - Would you disclose the actual profits if you made a lot of money buying the movie? No- Then shut the F*** Up and move on. Stop being greedy and pay for what you think the movie is worth for.
Also, if Rajni acts in another movie, these buggers will be the one again to inflate the price.
-
9th January 2015, 11:02 PM
#1473
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
Originally Posted by
leosimha
Exactly....the distributors/theatres owners are like middle men....they are too greedy....why they want to take loan and even buy the movie....if they had kept their stand...then vendhar movies would have also lowered their demand...everything is cyclic...you know...
How come theater owners be middle men? They own the theaters and they are "THE" stakeholders in taking the movie to the end consumer. This is case of an overrated product oversold. A mistake from the buyers to take it at just face value. But...but....looks like this trade doesn't allow distributors to watch the movie. So, the distributors/ theatre owners do not have the chance to check the end-product. They go simply by the trust factor. That is why that guy is repeating the "10 padayappa thingy", which is what the people involved in the project told them.
You could accuse them of foolishness but greed? Who gets the majority of the money from a rajni film success? Is he greedy too? What are you even talking about?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
9th January 2015, 11:07 PM
#1474
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
Originally Posted by
Saai
How come theater owners be middle men? They own the theaters and they are "THE" stakeholders in taking the movie to the end consumer. This is case of an overrated product oversold. A mistake from the buyers to take it at just face value. But...but....looks like this trade doesn't allow distributors to watch the movie. So, the distributors/ theatre owners do not have the chance to check the end-product. They go simply by the trust factor. That is why that guy is repeating the "10 padayappa thingy", which is what the people involved in the project told them.
You could accuse them of foolishness but greed? Who gets the majority of the money from a rajni film success? Is he greedy too? What are you even talking about?
Was the deal (Mannulipaambu deal) specific to Lingaa? How are other movies distributed?
-
9th January 2015, 11:09 PM
#1475
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
Originally Posted by
omega
Was the deal (Mannulipaambu deal) specific to Lingaa? How are other movies distributed?
The dumb guy told that too right? He tells its based on the actor's previous movie. In this case, they based it on Endhiran.... and did a decent markup on it ...lol
Realistically, the crew of the film will say its better than any rajni movie before. These guys should had been little sensible...
-
9th January 2015, 11:23 PM
#1476
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
Originally Posted by
Saai
The dumb guy told that too right? He tells its based on the actor's previous movie. In this case, they based it on Endhiran.... and did a decent markup on it ...lol
Realistically, the crew of the film will say its better than any rajni movie before. These guys should had been little sensible...
Who told you enthiran or sivaji did not hurt some distributors???
Why are you keep covering up that moron distributor, anyway??
This is a very big world!
-
9th January 2015, 11:25 PM
#1477
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
The fact is Sivaji and enthiran did hurt some distributors. AVM and sun network knew how to shut those guys up.
This is a very big world!
-
9th January 2015, 11:36 PM
#1478
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
thamiz
Who told you enthiran or sivaji did not hurt some distributors???
Why are you keep covering up that moron distributor, anyway??
Atleast one good thing which came out of this episode is all Black sheeps came out of shadows to show their ugly side. After all this atleast I would highly recommend Thaliavar to do something small
and completely different genre than this Robinhood, British ate pudding at paddington non-sense. Shivji-kku appa va naadikalam ?
My onions and Signature changes according to my desperate need to be in lime light as the BIG Brother :0 - just saying..
-
9th January 2015, 11:43 PM
#1479
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
Whenever you do a movie like enthiran, anniyan, this is what happens. If you ask me, somehow Lingaa got a great opening and at least it did not hurt the producers or original distributors like EROS. It has only hurt the local distributors and theatre owners, they never want to release Rajini movie as a "commision-based". They always want to take risk! Now it hurts them because they did take big risk!
This is a very big world!
-
9th January 2015, 11:46 PM
#1480
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
leosimha
there is a clear hand of the father-son duo....I can sense it psychologically by the events...anyways we are back to chandramukhi-sachin days....and now one other movie wants to be shown as the BB of 2014 ahead of Lingaa...
Originally Posted by
bimmer
^^^ Ayyo, Ayyo Athey santhegam than ennokum.
Originally Posted by
bimmer
Partheergala - No smoke without fire. Neruppu illamal pugayathu.
Originally Posted by
bimmer
PM ed - Hint - Moondru ezhuthu Kottai ezhuthu Iyyakunarum avarudaya otta pandhaya Maruthuvar maganum, Kalaikku puli pottavarum serthu seyyum jala bula jang
I guess all this nonsense attribution bias to SAC/Vijay or the Father-Son duo for anything and everything, takes source in the above 4 posts. Interestingly, these postmasters played pacifiers today, posting passionate pleas to calm down.
I am amused at the ‘Psychological’ feeling of someone here.
Leo, can be elaborate the exact sequence of events during Chandramuki-Sachin days that prompted you to psychologically blabber whatever you have?
Chandramukhi-Sachin was the case of a young actor with man-hair and gutso deciding to lock horns with 2 reigning superstars of tamil cinema, without any fear, without any buckling, without any postponement.
Quite a complete contrast to the recent chickening out, at the sight of Vishal’s Ambala.
You guys make a big deal of Villupuram run right?
How shall we call this Marathon then? Run29? Vishal-ed Run? VishalRun29? Ambala29Run?
So Vijay standing in front of his fans ‘begging’ to watch his movie for the producer’s sake is the lowest embarrassment of all, according to some.
How about wetting your pants at the sight of Vishal and Sundar C?
To me, it cannot get any wetter than this.This puts the famous Dharmadi Dharmendra episode to shame.
Jan 02 wasn’t it, the date that marked this landmark moment?
Maybe we should trend ‘Ambala29Run’ every year.
LOL, newspaper promotions have claimed a Pongal release until the 01st of January 2015 and between the 01st and the 02nd of January, some new unfinished business cropped up?
So who is the scapegoat? Harris Jeyaraj? Gautham Vasudev Menon? AM Ratnam? Trisha? Vivek?
Oh, ok but you know ‘Thala’ tried his best for Pongal release you know?
After shamelessly chickening out of the race, you have the nerve to bring Chandramukhi-Sachin, huh?
BTW, Leo, please provide reasons for your psychological thinking. Good solid reasons/sequences of events.
Originally Posted by
bill4u
I've also heard about that father-son thing from friends in Chennai. Too controversial to talk about since there's no proof ... but the father guy is capable of such mischief.
With all due respect, can you elaborate?
I don’t buy this ‘Father is Bad/Son is Better’ theory, It is Like Father / Like Son. Either the duo is bad or the duo is good. I believe the latter.
BTW, I am more interested in your ‘Father Guy is capable of such Mischief’ stuff. Though you say you don’t have proof about the ‘Father-Son’ duo, still you seam mighty convinced about the Father Guy.
Do you have any solid reasons and again with due respect for your posts, was it just based on hearsay or worse, was it just an attempt to divert frustration of Lingaa’s monumental failure to the industry’s most loved abuse material – SAC and Vijay, just like how it has been happening right from day 1 of Lingaa’s release?
In admiration of Mr. Evergreen Young, Mr. Box Office, Mr. Dance, Mr. MASS - | Ilayathalapathy VIJAY |
Bookmarks