Which non-indian film u saw recently has made u post here???

**littlemaster1982** · 31st October 2011, 09:24 AM

Duel

Speilberg

**Google Adsense** · 31st October 2011 09:24 AM

**kid-glove** · 31st October 2011, 01:17 PM

He was 24 when he shot it. 23 when he shot 'Murder by the book'. 27 when he made 'Sugarland Express'. 28 for 'Jaws'. I share a weakness for all four films..

**Roshan** · 31st October 2011, 01:52 PM

Revisited some parts of 'The Social Network'. This time I was very impressed with the way they have done the duel role Winklevoss Brothers. Technically so perfect. Dialogues

Jesse Eisenberg

What a natural ya !!

**littlemaster1982** · 31st October 2011, 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by kid-glove

He was 24 when he shot it. 23 when he shot 'Murder by the book'. 27 when he made 'Sugarland Express'. 28 for 'Jaws'. I share a weakness for all four films..

I was amazed at the control he had over the film. It's not easy to hold the viewer's attention for 90 mins with just a car and a truck in a highway

**kid-glove** · 31st October 2011, 04:31 PM

Absolutely, a near silent film shows real strengths of the filmmaker.

**Bing** · 1st November 2011, 08:26 PM

Inception..

I dont know for the nth time I think (Thanks to Sky movies)..

So Cobb asks Ariadne to draw a puzzle for about two minutes for a challenge of solving it in one minute.. She fails twice after having drawn the puzzle on the ruled note book. She then uses the back cover (without the ruler) of the notebook to draw the puzzle (round ones) which eventually Cobb fails to solve.. Nice one Mr. Nolan

2nd level dream - when there is no gravity, Arthur opens up the hotel room and finds everyone in the room including the phones are floating.. Automated message are being heard from the phone saying "please hang up" - Another nice one.. but I am just thinking whether he did a bit too much in this scene as phones normally dont go to speaker mode when they are not hung up?

**ajithfederer** · 2nd November 2011, 09:40 PM

Obviously there’s a love story here,” Mr. Eastwood said. “Whether it is a gay love story or something else — well, the audience can interpret it. My intention was to show two men who really love each other, and beyond that it’s none of my business.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/mo...nted=2&_r=1&hp