World Cricket II

**SoftSword** · 2nd April 2012, 02:19 AM

plis to note the 3rd and 4th images...

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/conte...30.html?page=1

**Google Adsense** · 2nd April 2012 02:19 AM

**satissh_r** · 2nd April 2012, 11:26 AM

Masai Warriors pics ah solringala?

**P_R** · 2nd April 2012, 01:28 PM

Broad not playing the second test due to 'injury' - Harbhy route follow paNraanO

Finn does not bat as well - dEi adhellAm engaLukkE theriyin.
So drop Monty

andha Patel dhadiyanai drop paNNungappA.

Batting pidikkaNumnu Patel-ai vachchuppAingaLaam, Monty-ai drop paNNuvAingaLaam.

Exactly India-Harbhy style selection decisions.

Pietersen is bowling in the nets it seems. avan avanukku therinja vElaiyai mudhalla ozhungA seinga dA.
annaiyum pidhAvyn munneri dheivam.

**SoftSword** · 2nd April 2012, 03:02 PM

Originally Posted by satissh_r

masai warriors pics ah solringala?

s s...

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 2nd April 2012, 03:03 PM

Fraud not Playing , Angelo in ! England better do some site seeing / shopping and pack their bags

**Plum** · 2nd April 2012, 03:22 PM

1. Finn is a better wicket taker than Broad 2. Broad didn't take that many anyway in the first test 3. Bresnan for Patel might simply induce Lanka to give a walk-over. If Tim Brezhnev plays, England will win. Period. 3. Accidentally, England seem close to pick the ultimate winning XI in Lanka. It's called destiny. It is anglo-saxon, and a close friend of St George. That's why they'll dominate the sport - on and off the field. That is why even when BCCI has all the power, most decisions in Cricket Admin tend to go through only if England benefit, directly or indirectly.

**Plum** · 2nd April 2012, 03:26 PM

Strauss's defiant Interview

. "What do you mean 'if it doesn't go well'? I'm not looking at it like that. I've got every intention of playoing well myself and every intention of us winning this test match". Ominous words of a man who clearly knows what he's talking. I believe Christine had to change bed covers yesterday.

**mgb** · 2nd April 2012, 03:32 PM

Originally Posted by P_R

So drop Monty

andha Patel dhadiyanai drop paNNungappA.

Batting pidikkaNumnu Patel-ai vachchuppAingaLaam, Monty-ai drop paNNuvAingaLaam.

Exactly India-Harbhy style selection decisions.

Monty is one guy who is expected to perform every match or else he will be dropped.. but swann can have it easy (could see a harby here as well).. despite not being selected for the 1st test match in dubai, monty ended up with more wickets in the series than swann.. but that doesn't matter it seems..
did you notice the comparison of monty with hearth in the article? why didn't they compare swann with ajmal in the earlier series?

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 2nd April 2012, 03:37 PM

Originally Posted by mgb

Monty is one guy who is expected to perform every match or else he will be dropped.. but swann can have it easy (could see a harby here as well).. despite not being selected for the 1st test match in dubai, monty ended up with more wickets in the series than swann.. but that doesn't matter it seems..
did you notice the comparison of monty with hearth in the article? why didn't they compare swann with ajmal in the earlier series?

Institutional Racism!

**P_R** · 2nd April 2012, 03:46 PM

There was some pressure on Swann, given how Monty had been performing. But now he has taken a five-for all is forgotten.
But it's baffling how they are now turning the pressure on Monty, who has been doing reasonably well from the time he returned.
Samit Patel guNdukkallaattam ukkAndhirukkAn

Monty-Swann vachchu naan ennellAm manakkOttai kattiyirukkEn.