The general comments did not stop with just UK, it also included Uganda, Somalia, Nigeria, Singapore and the likes. Hence i presumed the point of discussion was about the overseas market on the whole.
The difference between Jilla and Veeram was highlighted to show the importance of overseas markets, which was the context of our discussion.
I guess, you have just not read what i wrote despite quoting it.
My points in my previous post were:
1. We were talking about Tamil Movies whose success depends largely on the TN performance and not any other movie
2. No one here is gloating about UK or any other overseas success, we are only tying to consider them while judging the overall performance of the movie
Same points.
The TN importance is indisputable. I think i have acknowledged that in my previous post.
What surprises me now is the inclusion of Kerala as a good measure/extend, when the collections from overseas markets combined is more than Kerala.
Freedom, let's put a stop to the overseas discussions now, because barring a few places, both the movies have completed their runs. I don't think there would be many updates about overseas BO from any sites, twitter pages from now on which means that no one would be posting anything in that regard.
We shall continue to follow the fortunes of the movies in the TN market though. Cheers!