:victory:
Printable View
:victory:
Roger is not broken in this entire tournament :notworthy:
Roger Federer :clap: very good for him to extend No.1
Suddenly the strong era is looking like the weakest era!!
No wonder the strong player of a weak era is winning.
Was there a roof over the court?
Shame, the variables were not enough to disturb the strong player of weak era...
Good warm up for Djoker and Roger.
kg Why does all yankee stadium feel so yank, plastic and soulless? I say take off the extended US HC season. Only AA with lights on, is magical. Others are all so dry.
Where is Robot fan Rajeshkev? Idhuvum retirement benefit fund-a?
Illa straight a USO-va?
P.S: Cruel god will actually make Rajeshkrv's excuse come true, adhu vera vishayam
Yeah, unchecked optimism is setting up for a fall. Except for the Oracle. Federer will win the USO. Thus spake Oracle. Thy god reigneth. Amen.
Strongest player is missing, the player who Mr.Omeha was propagating to be 'faking injury' as per Uncle Toni's tonic, to magically return for USO. Another gift for Federer. As usual no response from Omeha.
KG
You have redefined the word "strong". What a coup! :lol2:
BTW, yet to get an answer from your side regarding the ownership by Robot. Unga narrow "convenient" sense laye varuvom, strongest player (because our mans your ditch) is robot's ditch, who seems to be turning into our ditch
Sachin Tendulkar is owned by Fannie Dw Villiers. So, Fanny is the strongest, greatest, deer, honey etc...
Yeah yeah, cricket != tennis and fdv!=Nadar but the fundamental prachanai is the same - using that as the main measure
Nadal has a 6-3 on GS to Djokovic, 8-2 to Federer. Next?
Duh, there's a thing called recent form, rise of form, peaking, trend etc??? Straight-a hero eh?
Appo 17 should be enough to put a lid on the other side right?
The Roddick era is exempted. Rest could be counted.
Adhulla his record with Nadal, without Nadal pOduvOma?
Federer fans shouldn't care about all this, aesthetics mattum pOdhum illaiya. Be happy with that.
Recent form. Nadar lost the Ozzie open on final set. But won the French.
Anyway, Djokovic usually beats Federer and then faces Nadar in the finals. So reductive logic that Fed beats the man who beats my man. And hey 'my man', me no gusta.
Well, I'd take that any day from an Arsenal fan :lol2:
Well, yeah Nadal era ain't over. Conditions ungalukku platter la vechu kudukkappattirukku, eppadiyum top la vandhuruveenga :thumbsup:
Exactly right. Andha madhiri 'Tsonga fan', 'Arsenal fan', 'Oranje fan'-nu sonnalE perumai thaanE. Why this GOAT, COW, LION gloryhunting, I say.
How about the logic to exempt the fact Djoker eliminated Federer before facing him in finals?
Well glory hunting for an individual (nation) great (foreigner alright) is less ridiculous than a cooked up, propagated, borrowed, fake identity with a *club* whose "greatness" at any point maybe susceptible. Yaaru ya pottadhu indha glory hunting taboo? Neenga enna edho naattu sudhandhirathukka paadu padreenga? And neraiya sprouts are causing untold damage in twitter/fb etc. At least you have depth of knowledge and insight. But wannabes aping you dont. :twisted:
And epitome of aesthetic high + success = Justice. Life is fair for a change
Per capita KG, per capita. Arsenal wins hands down. Talk about punching above and beyond your weight
Sulamangalam sisters madhiri volley kooda appappo double-handed a aada aaramippaanga, your strong men, appo rasinga. Appavum rasippeenga
There's always a narrative to be read in Williams sisters success and Chelsea's success in CL. Obviously it's not the same high as Federer's or Barcelona's, but still constant disintegration and integration is good for Sport.
But will continue to badmouth and wind-up people. It's addictive.
Of course, you've been consistent with your ideology, spare me the liberty of doubting the rest.
Personally I don't even care for glory-hunting than gloating.
As for twitter/FB/T-C/TT-F/T, irritation of pseudo-Fedtards irk me more than Manunited/Barca mostly 'harmless' glory-hunting.
Though in Twitter, I have the choice to follow views of Brian Philips and Steve Tignor, the idiots (most Arsenal fans are also Fedtards) litter my timeline. Heck, even Federer's an Arsenal fan sir. :lol2:
Intha generation volleys ah paarunga ;)
http://www.tennistv.com/video/clip/2030064
Federer played great match and make himself as one of the favorites to win US open. I still think Djokovic is still marginal favorite when compared with Federer going into US open.
Sampras once said, during his era where wimbledon courts were playing faster, he would never lose to double handed backhand player in the wimbledon. Today's courts pretty much kills all the advantages of playing with single handed backhand and that is the reason most of the today's top players have double handed backhand compared with single handed backhand of the previous era. Tennis changed and that is all.
Sure, Hoffa (Rafa) should weigh few pounds more than Roger & Nole, hence w/o doubt should be the strongest player..
Wait, didn't he win 2012 RG with injured knee (what a shame to the rest of the pros', they can't even beat a one legged rabbit).
How strategically he avoids meeting Roger....
Sure he has a great team to get him out of adversity at times of needs...
For all KG's arguments on Rafa/Federer it is true that Rafa leads federer in h2h but defeating federer alone is not going to give you GOAT. You have to be consistent everywhere my friend. Take Rafa's less than par 2nd half of the season record for instance.
And for the record I have to say Aus Open courts post 2007(yes since the 2008 event) were also slowed down enbadhai naan inge therivithu kolgiren.