Yes it does not qualify for block buster. To qualify blockbuster status either distributor or theatre owners need to report loss and go on hunger strike. It does not have any quality and it should be disaster at box office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert
edho nalla irundha sari.Quote:
Originally Posted by vithagan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert
exactly! it didnt even run for 4 days - Sripriya and co have been paying the theatres with counterfeit money - have been saying this for several weeks now
enna sir oru simple questionkku indha tragic reaction ? Sakala and Co has a tradition of claiming the bar from Widest torn opening to blockbuster in a phased manner and also some will tagged as classic for future generation's educational purpose.Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
Just asked a casual question sir :) cool ya
just gave a casual answer sir cool ya
Only Gajini fans will claim 400 Cr collection in 4 days while at the same time Sooooper will be conducting beram talks with distributors for their loss through back channels.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert
Theater la ottura gumbal kekkudhu :lol2:
there was a thread started by SKV - looking for it any idea where I can find it?
I think Admins deleted the thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
THE GENUINE SUCCESS STORY OF KAMAL'S PAPANASAM
Today, 21st August, Kamal Haasan - Jeethu Joseph's Papanasam enters the 50th day of its theatrical run. This film is one of the genuine successes this year, and has held on this long despite the hurricane-like run of Baahubali which released just a week after. Strong word of mouth and patronage from family audiences are main factors in the Papanasam success story.
Here we chat with George Pius of Wide Angle Creations, one of the producers of the film,
"We are naturally happy with the success of the film. We knew that this content would work and we were confident right from Day 1. The film is a profitable venture for all parties concerned."
On whether Papanasam would have done even better, if not for Baahubali.
"We knew that Baahubali would be coming a week after us, but were sure that our film had its own strengths and merits. Baahubali was of a different genre, and may be yes, Papanasam would have done even better if Baahubali hadn't released immediately after. But on the whole we at Wide Angle Creations are very happy with the success of the film, which has held on so long."
http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-mov...st-august.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by bill4u
what is the point in running for 50 days? did it break even?
:lol: :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
Funny...All online movie commentators mention the word "genuine" when they describe the success of Papanasam. Tells a lot about how genuine other movie hits are....
Why talk about break even status now ? It broke even in less than a week like 3-4 days. The article is about the producer's perspective on how the movie did. By mentioning 'profitable' its quite obvious its well way past the break even status.Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
I think the main reason for loss of the movie is, it was sold at ridiculously high price, by misleading the producers saying that this movie is 10 times bigger than dasavatharam and vishwaroopam. If they had not exaggerated the movie, this movie would have broke even for distributors. Very sad situation indeed.
ayya.. thanga mudiyalapa... vancha pugazchi ani'in ucha kattam.. nanum pakiren.. adaki vasikirar irir and innoruthar mela poi vera etho try panrer. Atha purichinkama oruthar BE la eppovoh ayiduthunrar.. Enna padam sir ithu?Quote:
Originally Posted by cinema
Well then if that was the case, I was not into all the sarcasm posts by irir and co. Was taking his post in face value ..Quote:
Originally Posted by Amarshiva
chi chi we dont want black money from karnataka...Quote:
Originally Posted by cinema
Bill4, even that couldn't be termed as sarcasm, as they were underplaying the #s. Because, when they tell the real truth about the success, there onethousand loads of questions that is why they have responded in that way. Since I am following their comments I couldn't control and posted like that. So just let it go.. We are celebrating the success and you are well wisher of us.. Just another day..Quote:
Originally Posted by bill4u
Success of what? Though this movie did not break even, it did break the producers and distributor bank accounts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bill4u
so far as there are genuine blockbusters rule the roost, Papanasam breaking even is questionable / debatable - it is all a make-believe game
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinema
அட சும்மா விவரம் தெரியாம பேசுறீங்களே?
Its to the undo the terrible BO disaster of this film, "Thoongavanam" had to be started and completed in a short time - even the Alwarpet home has been secretly written off as confidence/trust bondfor the producers and distributors/theatre owners involved in Papanasam..
கடவுள் இதர மூட நம்பிக்கைகள் எதுவும் இல்லாத கமல், பாபநாசம் அடைஞ்ச பெரும் தோல்வியினால, ஏதேதோ நம்பிக்கை எல்லாம் வந்து, இப்ப கிளி ஜோசியம், அரசமரத்தடி சாமியார், இமய மலை குருஜி, வாரனாசி அன்னாசி பழம், ரிஷிகேஷ் மாம்பழம், சிம்லா ஆப்பிள் இப்படி பித்து பிடிச்ச மாதிரி இருக்காராம்...
enough pl
:lol: irir, if we continue like this somebody may quote your post in some website and say that it is a evidence for failure..Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
Cinemarasigan - what is wrong? check out the thread where one Mr.Raajaa is posting evidence after evidence for Kamal films successful runs in more than one city - while someone else is converting the thread into a cacophonous fish market denying the evidence! கூவி கூவி விற்க try
பண்ணறாங்க - ஆனா முடியலயே!
நல்ல வேளை இவங்கல்லாம் Law படிச்சு did not end up becoming Defence Attornies - பாவம் இவங்க defend பண்ணுற அத்தன பேருக்கும் jail நிச்சயம்!
அவங்க சந்தோஷத்துக்கு பாபநாசம் படத்தோட பெரும் தோல்விய பகிர்ந்துக்கிட்டேன் (பிராணி ஒன்னு காள் காள் கத்துமே? அதுக்கு ஒரு புரைய்ய போடறதில்லையா? அது மாதிரின்னு வச்சுக்குங்க!)
avanga appadi thaan :lol2:Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
Avangellam romba decent people. Neenga appadiyellam solla koodathu. They do all the provoking and at the end they act as if they are nicest human beings on this planet.Quote:
Originally Posted by irir123
at COIMBATORE - ROYAL THEATER - DAILY 4 SHOWS from YESTERDAY 28-08-2015 - SUPER STARS KAMALKANTH / RAJINIHASSAN PRESENTS
ALLAVUDINUM ARPUTHA VILAKKUM !
http://i501.photobucket.com/albums/e...pssfbxa32w.jpg
:) Good one Sir!!Quote:
Originally Posted by RavikiranSurya
Papanasam -- 60th day. Glorious!
what is the official BO status?
I was sober when I watched it but why didn't the police enquire the little girl little more about what happened when she agreed to show them where the body was buried? I was intrigued till the end but that part and the ending ruined it for me even though that was the ending I was hoping for.
The little girl did not see the murder, she watched only when her Mom and sister burying something bundled in a sack...Quote:
Originally Posted by paranitharan
Yes, thats right .. its a reasonably tight script. All she knew peering through the window was her mom/sis burying something in a sack. Moreover by that time media found its way there. Once they found the contents after retrieving, hell broke loose for the illegal interrogation of his family including the little kid resulting in suspensions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinemarasigan
so why would she bring them over to their house when the police officer ask her if she knows the whereabouts of the guy. If she thought that something else was buried there then why should she bring them to her house?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinemarasigan
The kid didn't know what was buried by her mom and sister. She saw them burying a sack. But later, her father Suyambulingam would've umpteen times explained her about the murder and how to hide it from the police. So she would've known the complete scheme of things at the time of interrogation and would've directed the police to their yard as per her dad's plan.
Sent from my Micromax A102 using Tapatalk
he says he wont explain n only train them with the new information what they need to know..so little girl will not be trained with info abt murder but only the August 2nd they recreate..she only sees the sack being buried..i think he moved the body anticipating any of the three will reveal the information..and he can claim they have been tortured to say it...Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
yes... almost my thoughts..Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybaskar