YesQuote:
Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
Feddy :lol: Thamizh la kadaisiya Mounaguru thevala...
Printable View
YesQuote:
Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
Feddy :lol: Thamizh la kadaisiya Mounaguru thevala...
overrated-aaa??? sollave illa..Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
its nothing less than a classic..
super super slick movie... damn stylish .. naaasthi editing, chanceless music.. superb acting ... ungalukku itha vida enna saami venum ??
hero- heroine duet song-la slow motion-la odi vanthaa tension aayidalaamaa :P
starting at 4.06Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOuUFaT3siQ
Thalaivan :clap: Refer bala's avatar!
Well, some BR movies haven't aged well. Mundhi maadhiri eerkalai
Thala, when he "explodes" - avvalavu convincing-a irundhucha? Last night, a couple of examples bhakiaraj murder scene and when he screams at his servant when the game is up. Thala standards ku not so convincing, ennaya poruthavaraikkum
Yes I do see some kind of bias towards Kamal created later ones when compared with Kamal acted earlier ones or at least where the kamal's involvement is high. I do agree with the fact that Kamal created ones did raise the bar in Tamil Cinema but finding fault with his earlier films where he just acted is not fair.Quote:
Originally Posted by HonestRaj
Yes Kamal as an actor was still maturing during that stage and I don't think he became complete actor until later.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
enna unfair?Quote:
Originally Posted by tamizharasan
It's not like pathinaaru vayadhinilE is being shot down. That is all kinds of excellent.
I don't think sigappi is that good.
oru idhiya kudimagan, idhai solradhukku kooda urimai illaiyA?
சில படங்களுக்கு படம் வெளியான காலகட்டத்தை பொருத்திப்பார்ப்பதே சரி. அப்படிப்பார்த்தால் இந்தப்படத்தில் எந்த குறையும் இல்லையே! வெளியான காலத்தில் நன்கு ரிசீவ் ஆனது. இப்போதும் இந்தப்படத்தின் தாக்கம், இதிலுள்ள சில காட்சிகள், நடிப்பு இசை இதெல்லாம் ரசிக்கும்படி இருக்கிறது. 16 வயதினிலே போல் இல்லையென்றாலும் ரொம்ப மோசம் எல்லாம் இல்லையே! கலைஞன் படத்திற்கு இதன் பாதிப்பு தேவைப்பட்டது! அதாவது, 'ஏதாவது சிகப்பு ரோஜாக்கள் போல இருக்கும்' என எண்ண வைத்து ரசிகர்களை ஏமாற்றினார்கள்!
P_R
I am not great admirer of BR but my point was Kamal as a creator could not drag the audience along with him even though he could make movies to perfection if given a chance. (nooru, iranooru varusham pin thangiyirukkuRa indha tamizh cinemala vera enna panna mudiyumngreengala) Like Marudhanayagam would have been perfect movie from what I heard about his depth of research and depth of work was done before the movie could hit the floors. But it was very unfortunate that Movie has not been materialized yet because of the fear of its commercial viability. But the likes of BR struck the chord with audience by making decent movies for our audience even though all had their own share of flaws. Sivappu Rojakkal was definitely a good movie considering the development of Tamil Cinema at that point in time. ambuttuthEn, inna neenga pesunga.
16V does not need a time handicap. I like it as is even today: 'seeppu kuduththu vittaaLE...sillaRai kuduththu vittALA?...idhu eppadi irukku?' :lol:
Sigappi is not like that.
And moreover, it is quoted as en example of BR's stamping authority outside comfort zone etc. adhunaala edhirkka vENdi irukku.
btw..even back then, bayamE varaliyE.... oru maadhiri forced-A irunchch.