-
12th July 2012, 09:40 PM
#771
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber

Originally Posted by
P_R
enna false self portrayal?
naama kadandha oNNarai naaLaa edhai paththi pEsikkittrukkamO adhu
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
12th July 2012 09:40 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
12th July 2012, 10:26 PM
#772
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
How can you accuse Kamal of false self portrayal just because you want exactly equally weighted criticisms, kindals against all religions in his films? It is your problem, not his. That does not make him a "lesser" atheist by any means. Of course you can be disappointedand angry with him for not being equally vociferous, adhu vera vishayam. I, being a believer, find theists more problematic than atheists and agnostics. The posts by Cinefan and irir exactly prove my point and I hopeand I'm reasonably sure that those on the right will find Viswaroobam problematic. I just hope what PR (and I) fear will not happen (double sided mathala adi) - I don't have to be a fan of everything Islam, terrorism and regression to say this
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
-
12th July 2012, 10:31 PM
#773
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
"him for not being equally vociferous" - avLodhaan naan solla vandhadhu. BTW, why I should not allege based on the line which I quoted from ur post? I NEVER mentioned about atheism here. That is entirely out of scope for me. It's about the balance WRT criticizing religions. avLodhaan.
periyavar: "I, being a believer, find theists more problematic than atheists and agnostics.".
adiyEn: I believe in exactly the opposite. Opinions are like "you know what", everybody have one. Everybody is biased and select points which suits them / which helps them do business. Nobody is balanced, nobody is rational.
Last edited by sathya_1979; 12th July 2012 at 10:34 PM.
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
12th July 2012, 10:33 PM
#774
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
I will reverse the argument. I haven't seen a single convincing or heart felt condemnation of "our" shameful practicesfrom the groups which question periyar, kamal - not one, online or anywhere else. First adha seri pannittu apparam kamalagasanukku varalaam. For starters (this is not aimed at specific individuals here), practicing Brahmins have no locus standi in any of these matters. Zilch. Mum by default. Those who shed that identity completely can talk (applies downwards accordingly)
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
-
12th July 2012, 10:36 PM
#775
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
I hope my tone is not misunderstood. In a way it is self critical too
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
-
12th July 2012, 10:41 PM
#776
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber

Originally Posted by
Bala (Karthik)
I will reverse the argument. I haven't seen a single convincing or heart felt condemnation of "our" shameful practicesfrom the groups which question periyar, kamal - not one, online or anywhere else. First adha seri pannittu apparam kamalagasanukku varalaam. For starters (this is not aimed at specific individuals here), practicing Brahmins have no locus standi in any of these matters. Zilch. Mum by default. Those who shed that identity completely can talk (applies downwards accordingly)
I guess you are not the authority to define who should question what. I am proud that I touched ur nerve
BTW, discrimination ellaam ellarum seiyyaradhudhaan, paramakudi thuppaakki soodu and kalavaram year after year - pooNal pOttavangaLaa munna ninnu nadaththaraanga? Let all those who did a crime / mistake / blunder apologize - and then expect apology. illaatti thappE seiyyaadha oru group vandhu thappa sutti kaattatum, mannippu ennaa kaalla vizharadha paththi kooda pEsalaam.
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
12th July 2012, 10:46 PM
#777
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
BTW, thanks to you too for ur time and posts. Helped in understanding counter POV. But, as always, this will not go any further as pointers and counter-pointers are not going to change.
adhanaala natpaa bye bye sollittu indha discussion close seiyyalaam. What say?
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
12th July 2012, 10:52 PM
#778
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Sathya
Why this confrontational stance? You didn't touch my nerve but missed the point I'm trying to make. Mobile la detailed-a type panna kashtama irukku...
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
-
12th July 2012, 10:55 PM
#779
Senior Member
Diamond Hubber

Originally Posted by
equanimus
The way I see it, Kamal's films are too seeped in Hindu identity/culture to be anti-Hindu. At a minimum, one should qualify his films as Hindu in some ways. That's my basic point here.
Just like how atheists qualify as 'theists' in some ways to Gray, fellow skeptics and homeless people.
...an artist without an art.
-
12th July 2012, 10:55 PM
#780
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
"applies downwards accordingly", "in a way self critical too" ......^
This is about caste *identity*, the mere existence of it, which in my opinion should go. and it starts with my kurupp.
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"
Bookmarks