Please read the interview one more time. BRangan did not ask him to talk only the incidents from set. Kamal was starting to share right from the creation point. "Atha poyi perusaa eduthikittu." - அப்படியல்ல. அந்தப் படத்திற்கு ராஜாவின் உழைப்பு அப்படி. இருபத்தைஞ்சு வருஷம் கழிச்சி அசை போடும்போது, அவரின் பெயரும் இடம் பெற்றிருக்க வேண்டும்.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramakrishna
IR will not have any issue with that interview because he knows how much Kamal respects/loves him.Quote:
Originally Posted by venkkiram
Even one of the most die hard IR fans also has no issue :)
me-thinks the sequence is like this:
1. Kamal says certain things abt NAYAKAN shooting/making to B Rangan.
2. B.Rangan either deliberately twists Kamal's words or simply misinterprets it - am not surprised, esp after him asking GVM "everyone knows abt IR's talent, but why did you go to him ?" which was not in good taste - poor journalistic standards - and publishes the interview.
3.Muktha Srinivasan reads it and gives his version - contradictory statements - esp the one regarding how he vetoed Kamal's suggestion to shoot in Dharavi and instead incurred unwanted extra expenses by erecting slum sets in Chennai - now, who is to blame ? avaru solradha paartha, vayasaanavanga senility kaaranamaa enna solromney theriyaama solra matter madhiri irukku!
indha vishayathula SKV sollradhu 100% nyayam thaen!
sari, ivvalavu solra MS, yaen, padathhoda kadhai pudikkalenna, 'I wont finance / produce this film' appadeennu solli escape aayirukkalaam illa ??
so appa Kamal + MR koottani thevappattadhu - padam tholvinnu solradhu sappa kattu - Udhayam theatrela mattum 175 plus days (3 shows) odinadhu yenakku theriyin - in fact, when our family got to watch it past 100 days, we cudnt get tickets for a weekend evening show!
andha areavula thaanungo nanga irundhom
and it was a major hit all over TN likewise - and no way it could NOT have made profits!
he says he didnt make money out of the film.. but others obviously made.. so that shows that Muktha was just too generous to under sell the movie..
orey kuzhappam - so why blame Kamal ? blame it on GV and co who forced him to sell the film to them/him ??
if he undersold the film, then it was his fault at not being able to predict its BO success, right ?
oru velai, sour grapes style angalaaippaa idhu ?
When I told about these articles to my uncle who knew about "Mukta", he also told that Mukta is a short tempered , "patthu roobA invest paNNanumnaa 8 roobA thaan koduppaaru andha aaLu", "Nayagan padattha sumaaraana laabatthukku vitthuttu summA nashtam aanavar maadhiri eludhuraar"...Quote:
Originally Posted by joe
having been following Mani's works, i do realise that its mani who is more of a godfather veriyan than kamal......so, muktha saying mani had written initially a story that was different from godfather and kamal made it a godfather is not entirely believable.......also, kamal not agreeing to sivaji ganesan in nayagan is also not believable since he made DevarMagan with same cast for same storyline......
i know this is exaggerated version to completely water down kamal's version but not without truths....ex: the salary part, "budget for those days", saranya character etc were already known through other sources......without documentary evidence, both sides stand can be called "versions of facts" - more like watching Rashomon :D ........mani, i hope, much like his friend AR had stayed away from controversies during his talk to BR......its a dead horse, dont beat it.....
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
No, Mani should come out with his version of this story so that many things will be solved..Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY
nobody would believe it.....mani mapillai, kamal chinna maamanaar - yaar saar nambuvaanga......infact, mani will be unneccessarily be called a liar to save his relatives......Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinemarasigan
:notthatway: Mani has a reputation, most of the people will believe that Mani is very honest!!Quote:
Originally Posted by MADDY