Professor FEDERER
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/...588649262.html
Some good pics in there!!.
Omega, You've been watching the matches right?. What do you feel?. Vinod???
1. 16 + Counting Grandslams
2. 237 Continous weeks as No 1;
3. 23 Consecutive Grandslam semifinals (2004 Wimbledon - 2010 Australian Open)
4. 92-5 Win loss in the year 2006; 12 Titles ; Talk about almost total domination.
5. 44+ titles in Hard courts; 2 shy of tying all time leader Agassi.
6. 65 consecutive grass court match victories (2003 - 2008)
7. 56 consecutive hard court match victories (2005–2006)
8. 22 Grandslam Finals.
9. Only Player to win ATP WTF undefeated 4 times (2003, 2004, 2006, 2010).
10. The biggest of all; 5 Consecutive Wimbledons+ 5 Consecutive US Opens (Somebody defeat this feat!!)
Professor FEDERER
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/...588649262.html
Some good pics in there!!.
Omega, You've been watching the matches right?. What do you feel?. Vinod???
Will never miss Roger in action!!!Originally Posted by ajithfederer
He is looking good, serving at a high % so far. Will get tougher as he gets deeper though.
Things can change very quickly with Roger when his first serve % drops with better returners in the wings.
Will be happy if he reaches final...
same here except the 1st line. Even better if he wins it.
Nole looks scary good!!
Federer beats Raonic 6-4, 7-6 (7-4), 6-2.
Couldn't catch Roger's first 3R matches. Watched full match today. Not a good match. No big rallies. Roger looks fresh and had very good control on his first serves. Mathapadi inniku match la irunthu vera yethuvum perusa illa.
Like Roger with inner T. He looks damn cool
Great picture there Stan.
35th Grand slam Quarters in a row...WAG
Wow!! Tsonga played real high quality match without losing focus for the most part. His thunderous serve along with heavy ground strokes on both wings were just amazing. He was the one mostly bossing around the rallies except the initial part of 1st set, both the tie-breakers & 5th set. No wonder Tsonga looked very relaxed despite the close loss he had. He had a terrific match for sure.
What can we say about Roger? Despite having a very poor 1st serve % (< 50%) for the first 2 sets he raised his game enough to grab the 1st set. He moved well & stayed with Tsonga for the most part. In the end both had won 27 games a piece with Roger winning just 5 points more than Tsonga on the whole (169 vs 164 I guess). Tsonga had 20 aces to 6 by Roger.
During the 4th set when Tsonga was absolutely dominating, Eurosport commentators (Mats Wilander & Simon Reed) started their usual stuff that Roger struggles against the top 10 of this era unlike the likes of Hewitt, Roddick etc whom he used to absolutely dominate. Just can’t understand their logic at all. Here is a guy who is 31 years old still pushing guys who are 5-6 years younger than him to the brink & losing to them only because of his age factor (whenever he loses) & still they indirectly have to say that Roger dominated only the weak era. Lets wait until pushers of this era become above 30 to see where they’ll be…These morons will never change!!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks