-
18th July 2012, 01:15 AM
#11
Senior Member
Platinum Hubber
While cross-lingual distortions happen all the time, the case of 'am' vikuthi is quite unique.
For one thing, the quantum of words affected is a huge number.
Next, it seems to be quite consistent between Thamizh & vada mozhi (i.e. Thamizh always has it while vada mozhi doesn't).
mukh - mukam (face)
man - manam (mind)
hridhay - irudhayam (heart)
udhay - udhayam (rise)
I don't know whether HC-Thamizh-fanatic-etymologists will agree, but my personal theory is all such words weren't Thamizh originals but got imported from vada mozhi. One of my former co-workers used to justify this with words such as prakAsh / prakAsam, telling that Thamizh cannot have any word starting with consonant...(now, let me run for cover)...
-
18th July 2012 01:15 AM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
Bookmarks